En morders fortid
Tilbage i Riverside�police hovedkvarter begyndte detektiven på mordet Christina Keers og John Davis at stille spørgsmålstegn ved den mistænkte.� Forhørene varede i timevis, og Lane siger, at det var tilstrækkeligt nægtet nogen involvering i prostitutionsmordet.
Bill er tilstrækkelig med sin datter �
As investigators scrambled to find evidence, members of the media began digging into Suffs past.� �While his family remained tight-lipped and details of his early life remain vague, they were able to obtain several bits of information from public records.� According to Keers and Lane, William Lester Suff was born on August 20, 1950, in Torrance, California.� Unfortunately, when it comes to early childhood events - invariably, the most interesting pieces of the Puzzle�- meget lidt er kendt.� Med hensyn til hans søskende var Suffs Brothers også urolige, den ene af narkotika, den anden ved en irriterende predilektion for pedofili.�
Bill Suff Mugshot, 1974 �
According to school classmates, Suff was a friendly person and skillful musician, who graduated 87th in a class of 144.� �The image of the friendly personality disintegrated with the 1974 report that Suff, then 24, and his former wife were arrested and later convicted of beating their two-year-old daughter to death.� Suff was sentenced to 70 years in prison, but earned his parole in March 1984, after serving only 10 years.� His wife served a mere 20 months before having her conviction overturned.�
I 1986 begyndte Suff at arbejde som aktieansvarlig for amtet og havde ironisk nok leveret møbler til Riverside Task Force-hovedkvarteret midtvejs gennem drabspirrene.� � Friends of Suff beskrev ham som en mild mand, der holdt sig til sig selv og brugte sine fritid på at skrive historier og kogebøger. ��
Bill Suff, da han vandt Chili Cook-Off-konkurrence � ��
Den 28. februar 1992 blev Suff arrangeret for dommer Becky Dugan i Division 22 i Riverside Municipal Courthouse.� Suffs Attorney, Floyd Zagorsky, indgik et anbringende om uskyldig i to af de 19 dødsfald, som hans klient blev tiltalt.� Efter at have hørt argumenter fra begge sider, afgav dommer Dugan, der var tilstrækkelig bevis for at sende sagen til retssag.
